You are viewing the site in preview mode

Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: No reduction in instrumental vaginal births and no increased risk for adverse perineal outcome in nulliparous women giving birth on a birth seat: results of a Swedish randomized controlled trial

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
14 Jul 2010 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
7 Dec 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Caroline Homer
15 Dec 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Christine East
24 Jan 2011 Author responded Author comments - Linda Kvist
Resubmission - Version 3
24 Jan 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 3
24 Jan 2011 Author responded Author comments - Linda Kvist
Resubmission - Version 4
24 Jan 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 4
10 Feb 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Christine East
15 Feb 2011 Author responded Author comments - Linda Kvist
Resubmission - Version 5
15 Feb 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
24 Mar 2011 Editorially accepted
24 Mar 2011 Article published 10.1186/1471-2393-11-22

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement