You are viewing the site in preview mode

Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Assessing the quality of record keeping for cesarean deliveries: results from a multicenter retrospective record review in five low-income countries

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
30 May 2013 Submitted Original manuscript
30 May 2013 Author responded Author comments - Evelyn Landry
Resubmission - Version 2
30 May 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 2
22 Jul 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Nanna Maaløe
20 Aug 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Thomas van den Akker
30 Aug 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Karlyn Frank
23 Oct 2013 Author responded Author comments - Evelyn Landry
Resubmission - Version 3
23 Oct 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 3
18 Nov 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Nanna Maaløe
22 Nov 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Karlyn Frank
5 Jan 2014 Author responded Author comments - Evelyn Landry
Resubmission - Version 4
5 Jan 2014 Submitted Manuscript version 4
5 Feb 2014 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Nanna Maaløe
27 Feb 2014 Author responded Author comments - Evelyn Landry
Resubmission - Version 5
27 Feb 2014 Submitted Manuscript version 5
2 Apr 2014 Author responded Author comments - Evelyn Landry
Resubmission - Version 6
2 Apr 2014 Submitted Manuscript version 6
2 Apr 2014 Author responded Author comments - Evelyn Landry
Resubmission - Version 7
2 Apr 2014 Submitted Manuscript version 7
Publishing
4 Apr 2014 Editorially accepted
12 Apr 2014 Article published 10.1186/1471-2393-14-139

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement