- Case report
- Open Access
- Open Peer Review
Prenatal diagnosis of pygopagus tetrapus parasitic twin: case report
© Gul et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2004
- Received: 26 March 2004
- Accepted: 13 July 2004
- Published: 13 July 2004
Asymmetric and parasitic conjoined twins are rarer anomalies of monochorionic monoamniotic twins, consisting of an incomplete twin attached to the fully developed body of the co-twin.
A 30-year-old multigravid woman referred to maternal fetal unit due to polyhydramnios at 28th week of gestation. Sonographic examination revealed a single fetus and polyhydramnios with amniotic fluid index 30 cm. The fetus had normal apparent single head, spine, thorax, abdomen, two upper and two lower limbs, and two relatively well developed rudimentary parasitic lower limbs at sacral region. Lower limbs of the autosite were moving freelly but no movement was detected at the parasite. The parasite contained irregular lower limbs and left foot with three toes. Short and deformed long bones were also present in the parasitic limbs. A Cesarean section was performed at 38th week of gestation and a live female infant weighing 3600 g was delivered. The parasitic lower limbs were totally excised. Post-operative period was uneventful and the newborn was discharged as healthy. Post-natal follow-up was normal at nine-month-old.
Pygopagus tetrapus parasitic twin is a rare form of conjoined twins and in utero diagnosis with ultrasound assists in prenatal management and counselling with parents.
- Prenatal Diagnosis
- Sonographic Examination
- Amniotic Fluid Index
Conjoined twins are rare, with an estimated frequency of one in 50,000–100,000 births . Asymmetric and parasitic conjoined twins are rarer anomalies of monochorionic monoamniotic twins, consisting of an incomplete twin attached to the fully developed body of the co-twin. Prenatal diagnosis of conjoined twins with B-mode ultrasound (US) [2, 3], computed tomography (CT) , three-dimensional US [5, 6], and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)  has been reported. Parasitic conjoined twin diagnosed in utero was presented in few cases previously [7, 8]. But literature review failed to identify a case of pygopagus tetrapus parasitic twin detected in utero. We report a case of pygopagus tetrapus parasitic twin diagnosed at 28th week of gestation and delivered a live baby at term.
Pathologic examination demonstrated skin covered parasitic body. Two deformed lower limbs were attached to the sacral mass. After dissection of the mass and the parasitic limbs, long bones of bilateral lower limbs and some pelvic bone were seen.
Classification of conjoined twins based on the theoretical site of union .
Extent of union
Ventral (87 %)
Rostral (48 %)
Top of head to umbilicus
Thorax, upper abdomen, conjoined heart
Thorax, upper abdomen, separate hearts
Caudal (11 %)
Lower abdomen, genitourinary tract
Lateral (28 %)
Pelvis, variable trunk
Dicephalus 2 heads
Diprosopus 2 faces
Dorsal (13 %)
Vertebral column (midportion)
Prenatal recognition of conjoined twins and precise characterization of the malformations are required for optimal obstetric management. Currently, sonographic diagnosis of conjoined twins may be straightforward if fusion of fetal parts is obvious. In utero diagnosis of conjoined twins was reported previously [2–5]. But prenatal diagnosis of parasitic conjoined twins is relatively difficult becasue of changing fetal positions and the rarity of these abnormalities as with any rare medical entity. Parasitic conjoined twins identified at birth were reported [11–15], but so far two cases diagnosed in utero with US and MRI were presented in the literature [7, 8].
Sonographic findings in conjoined twins include inseperable fetal bodies and skin contours, no change in the relative postions of the fetuses and shared organs. Polyhydramnios is a secondary finding that occurs in 50% of conjoined twin pregnancies [15, 16]. Hence the site and extent of twin fusion are variable, a careful evaluation with US may help to identify parasitic conjoined twins in utero. Differential diagnosis includes parasitic twin, fetus in fetu (internal parasite) and teratoma. Presence of rudimentary lower limbs with foot in our case suggested the parasitic conjoined twin. The prognosis depends on the site and extent of twin fusion.
In our case, during routine prenatal examination, the woman had three US scanning and had no abnormal findings noted until she was referred for polyhydramnios at 28 weeks' gestation, suggesting that prenatal diagnosis is relatively difficult. Rarity of the condition may lead to misdiagnosis or undiagnosed. Although our case was referred for detailed US due to polyhydramnios, its etiology is not clear and parasitic site might have vascular malformation that may lead to increased volume of circulation, like in the cases having teratoma and arteriovenous malformations. Hyperdynamic cardiac activity and increased cardiac output might casued polyhydramnios in our case. Even though it is rare, a parasitic conjoined twin should be considered in the differantial diagnosis when polyhydramnios is present. Prenatal diagnosis in our case helped in counselling with the parents and in management of the case and delivery.
In conclusion, pygopagus tetrapus parasitic twin is a rare form of conjoined twin with a favorable outcome. Obstetrician should be aware of the existence of a parasitic twin during prenatal examinations and the importance of the differential diagnosis of parasite and teratoma. Delivery at a tertiary center is highly suggested for optimal neonatal intensive care and pediatric surgical intervention.
"Written consent was obtained from the patient for publication of study"
- Edmonds LD, Layde PM: Conjoined twins in the United States. Teratology. 1982, 25: 301-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Daskalakis G, Pilalis A, Tourikis I, Moulopoulos G, Karamoutzos I, Antsaklis A: First trimester diagnosis of dicephalus conjoined twins. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2004, 112: 110-3. 10.1016/S0301-2115(03)00268-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sen C, Celik E, Vural A, Kepkep K: Antenatal diagnosis and prognosis of conjoined twins: a case report. J Perinat Med. 2003, 31: 427-30.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Abrams SL, Callen PW, Anderson RL, Stephens JD: Anencephaly with encephalocele in craniopagus twins:prenatal diagnosis by ultrasonography and computed tomography. J Ultrasound Med. 1985, 4: 485-8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sepulveda W, Munoz H, Alcalde JL: Conjoined twins in a triplet pregnancy: early prenatal diagnosis with three-dimensional ultrasound and review of the literature. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2003, 22: 199-204. 10.1002/uog.185.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Chen CP, Shih JC, Shih SL, Huang JK, Huang JP, Lin YH, Wang W: Prenatal diagnosis of cephalothoracopagus janiceps disymmetros using three-dimensional power Doppler ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2003, 22: 299-304. 10.1002/uog.226.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Esenkaya S, Gurbuz B, Yalti S: Asymmetric parasitic dicephalus conjoined twins. J Clin Ultrasound. 2004, 32: 102-5. 10.1002/jcu.10227.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tan A, Lee SL: Prenatal diagnosis of parasitic twins using three-dimensional ultrasound: a case report. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2002, 20: 192-3. 10.1046/j.1469-0705.2002.00740.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Spencer R: Anatomic description of conjoined twins: a plea for standardized terminology. J Pediatr Surg. 1996, 31: 941-4. 10.1016/S0022-3468(96)90417-0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Spencer R: Parasitic conjoined twins: external, internal (fetuses in fetu and teratomas), and detached (acardiacs). Clin Anat. 2001, 14: 428-44. 10.1002/ca.1079.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gilbert-Barness E, Opitz JM, Debich-Spicer D, Mueller T, Arnold S, Quintero R: Fetus-in-fetu form of monozygotic twinningn with retroperitoneal teratoma. Am J Med Genet. 2003, 120: 406-12. 10.1002/ajmg.a.10153.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kakkar N, Vasishta RK, Panwar M, Narang A, Gupta I, Banerjee AK: Chorangiopagus parasiticus twins. Pediatr Pathol Mol Med. 2002, 21: 551-5. 10.1080/15227950290112806.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Szu-Yuan Chou, So-Jung Liang, Chih-Fen Wu, Chun-Sen Hsu: Sacral Parasite Conjoined Twin. Obstet Gynecol. 2001, 98: 938-40. 10.1016/S0029-7844(01)01482-X.Google Scholar
- Kapur Vk, Kulkarni MS, Shenoy MU: Asymmetric conjoined twins. Pediatr Surg Int. 1997, 12: 308-9. 10.1007/s003830050139.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Strauss S, Tamarkin M, Engelberg S, Ben Ami T, Goddman RM: Prenatal sonographic appearance of diprosopus. J Ultrasound Med. 1987, 6: 93-5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Barth RA, Filly RA, Goldberg JD, Moore P, Silverman NH: Conjoined Twins: Prenatal Diagnosis and Assessment of Associate Malformations. Radiology. 1990, 177: 201-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2393/4/13/prepub
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article: verbatim copying and redistribution of this article are permitted in all media for any purpose, provided this notice is preserved along with the article's original URL.