You are viewing the site in preview mode

Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Comparing satisfaction and burnout between caseload and standard care midwives: findings from two cross-sectional surveys conducted in Victoria, Australia

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
11 Sep 2014 Submitted Original manuscript
12 Sep 2014 Author responded Author comments - Michelle Newton
Resubmission - Version 2
12 Sep 2014 Submitted Manuscript version 2
9 Oct 2014 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Nicky Leap
17 Oct 2014 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Sarah Beake
18 Oct 2014 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Christine McCourt
12 Nov 2014 Author responded Author comments - Michelle Newton
Resubmission - Version 3
12 Nov 2014 Submitted Manuscript version 3
2 Dec 2014 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Nicky Leap
4 Dec 2014 Author responded Author comments - Michelle Newton
Resubmission - Version 4
4 Dec 2014 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
11 Dec 2014 Editorially accepted
24 Dec 2014 Article published 10.1186/s12884-014-0426-7

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement