- Research article
- Open Access
- Open Peer Review
Reasons for current pregnancy amongst grand multiparous Gambian women - a cross sectional survey
© The Author(s). 2016
- Received: 9 June 2015
- Accepted: 2 August 2016
- Published: 11 August 2016
While grand multiparity is now relatively rare in the developed world it is still common in Sub Saharan Africa. Although significant resources have been committed to providing modern contraceptive methods in the Gambia, the total fertility rate is still high at 5.6. Determining the reasons grand multiparous women proffer for the current pregnancy may help in understanding this trend and tailoring appropriate messages to address any specific concerns.
A cross sectional survey of grand multiparous women was carried out at the Royal Victoria Teaching Hospital (now Edward Francis Small Teaching Hospital) to determine the reasons for the current pregnancy.
The prevalence of grand multiparity was 26.5 % while the average parity among the study population was 7.2 (sd 1.8). The most common reasons given for the current pregnancy were: the desire for another child (22.8 %), the pregnancy was unplanned - a “mistake” (18.4 %) and the need to replace a dead child (15.4 %).
Grand multiparity is still very common in The Gambia. Additional efforts are required to target those with unplanned pregnancies. Improving child survival may also decrease the prevalence of grand multiparity.
- Grand multiparity
A grand multiparous woman is one who has carried five or more pregnancies to the age of viability . Although grand multiparity does not necessarily end in adverse pregnancy outcomes, studies in Sub-Saharan Africa show that it remains a significant contributor to maternal and perinatal morbidity and mortality [2–4]. It is associated with maternal anaemia in pregnancy, antepartum haemorrhage, abnormal foetal presentation, postpartum haemorrhage as well as medical conditions such as hypertension in pregnancy [2–4]. The grand multiparous woman is also more likely to require a surgical obstetric intervention with its attendant risks . In addition, there are associated perinatal problems including low birth weight, preterm birth and congenital malformations .
The risks associated with grand multiparity have been significantly reduced in developed countries since Bethel Solomons first described the phenomenon as the “dangerous multipara” in 1934 [1, 6]. Current incidence in these settings now ranges from 3 to 4 % . This is due to the high literacy level, availability of modern contraceptive methods, liberal abortion laws and the improved health care services which ensure the survival of almost all children [9, 10]. High parity is however still a common problem in obstetric practice in many developing countries with incidence ranging from 17 to 33 % in Sub-Saharan African countries [5, 11, 12]. Thus, grand multiparity could be seen as an indicator of low literacy, poverty and other forms of injustice and inequity faced by women in the developing world. Programs aimed at empowering women such as girl child education take a while to drastically create a significant dent in the grim maternal mortality statistics from Africa. Thus, improving access to effective family planning methods remains one of the cardinal “quick fix” strategies available in the fight to reduce maternal mortality.
The Gambian National Reproductive Health Policy provides for the provision of free family planning services in all the health centres in the country. Despite this huge investment in family planning by the government and international donors, grand multiparity remains a common feature of obstetric practice in The Gambia. The crude birth rate is 27/1000 population while the total fertility rate is 5.6 births per woman . According to WHO estimates, the maternal mortality rate in The Gambia is 430/100,000 live births . The commonest causes of these maternal deaths in the hospital are obstetric haemorrhage, hypertensive diseases in pregnancy and sepsis [15, 16].
Studies from other parts of Sub-Saharan Africa have alluded to various reasons for the current pregnancy amongst grand multiparous women. Prominent amongst these are: the desire for large family size, the desire to have a child for a new husband, gender preferences, loss of a child and failed contraception [17, 18]. This study aimed to describe the reasons for the current pregnancy amongst grandmultiparous women at the antenatal clinic of the Royal Victoria Teaching Hospital (RVTH). The study also assessed the contraceptive knowledge and beliefs about contraception of grand multiparous women.
The study was conducted at the RVTH (now Edward Francis Small Teaching Hospital), Banjul, The Gambia. RVTH is the only tertiary health facility in The Gambia serving its 1.7 million population. The country is a narrow strip of land bordered on three sides by Senegal with a strip of coastline bordering the Atlantic Ocean. RVTH offers primary health care services to women in the greater Banjul area and also serves as the main referral centre for specialized tertiary maternity and reproductive health services.
A structured, pre-tested interviewer administered questionnaire was used (see Additional file 1: Questionnaire: reasons for current pregnancy amongst grand multiparous Gambian women). The questionnaire was verbally translated into the local languages for those illiterate in English. Ethical approval for the study was obtained from the Royal Victoria Teaching Hospital Ethics Committee before commencement of the study. Written, signed informed consent was obtained from each participant prior to the first study procedure. Information was read to the non-literate and translated verbally into their local language of choice. These individuals were then required to thumb print the consent form.
Demographic characteristics of study participants
7.2 (sd 1.8)
Average number of children alive
5 (sd 2.1)
Arabic School only
Place of delivery in last pregnancy
Antenatal clinic attendance in last pregnancy
Contraceptive counseling in last pregnancy
Common stories about contraception that the participants have heard
It causes menstrual abnormalities
It causes severe diseases including cancer
It is effective in child spacing
It decreases the potential for subsequent fertility
It is unreliable (fails easily)
It is forbidden on religious grounds
It generally improves health
Beliefs about contraception by participants
Contraception is against my religious belief
26 (19.1 %)
36 (26.5 %)
36 (26.5 %)
18 (13.2 %)
20 (14.7 %)
Contraceptives can prevent subsequent pregnancy
15 (11.0 %)
28 (20.6 %)
28 (20.6 %)
22 (16.2 %)
43 (31.6 %)
Contraception causes serious illness
21 (15.6 %)
30 (22.2 %)
38 (28.2 %)
24 (17.8 %)
22 (16.3 %)
Methods of contraceptives used in the past by study participants
Reasons given for not using contraceptive
Afraid of side effects
Did not know about family planning
Did not know where to get
My partner refused
No specific reason
Reason for current pregnancy in study participants
Reasons for index pregnancy
Death of another child
While 95 (69.9 %) of the participants were willing to use a contraceptive method at the end of the current pregnancy, 40 (29.4 %) were not willing to use any method and one person (0.7 %) was undecided.
Seventy-five (55.1 %) said their partner would support their decision regarding family planning while 51 (37.5 %) said partner would not support their decision and 10 (7.4 %) were unsure.
The prevalence of grandmultiparity in our study was 26.5 %. This is similar to other studies conducted in the sub-region with prevalence ranging from 17 to 33 % [5, 11, 12]. However, in developed countries, grand multiparity is comparatively lower ranging from 3 to 4 % . This difference has been attributed to disparity in literacy level, health care services, availability, accessibility of modern contraceptive methods and differing abortion laws [9, 10].
Evidence of adverse pregnancy outcome in high parity is overwhelming and the risk is higher for great grand multiparous women with over ten children compared to grand multiparous women [4, 19–22]. These obstetric complications include hypertension, gestational diabetes, abruptio placenta, placenta praevia, foetal macrosomia, multiple pregnancy, labour dystocia, uterine rupture and perinatal death [4, 19–21]. Grand multiparity and great grand multiparity are independent risk factors for labour dystocia and perinatal mortality .
In our study, the majority (55.9 %) had no formal education and only 6.6 % had a civil job. The majority were housewives (33.8 %) and petty traders (41.2 %). These findings correlate with previous studies that had implicated poverty; poor education and ignorance as the driving force for low uptake of contraceptives and “mistake” as a reason for index pregnancy as seen in this study .
Our data suggests little awareness of male and female sterilization in study participants. As over 90 % of the participants had their last delivery at a health facility, a case could be made for offering post partum tubal ligation to women who may desire a permanent method of contraception. Postpartum tubal ligation is known to be a safe, cost effective method of contraception . Currently, this is not the policy or practice in the public health institutions in the Gambia.
We demonstrated that 97.1 % of our study participants were aware of the availability of contraception. In fact, 56.6 % of these mothers had been counseled regarding availability, accessibility and various options available for contraception in the hospital before discharge in their previous pregnancy. Majority of them had their last delivery in the hospital (93.4 %) and lived in an urban area (70.6 %). Therefore, inability to use contraception to prevent the occurrence of index pregnancy was not due to lack of contraception or accessibility, rather the beliefs and stories the women heard regarding contraception likely affected willingness to use contraception resulting in the index pregnancy. A study conducted by Adanu et al in the sub-region showed that education influences the uptake of modern contraception among women in Sub-Saharan Africa . This is in keeping with our finding as more than 55 % of our study participants did not have any formal education.
While 95 (69.9 %) of the participants were willing to use a contraceptive method at the end of the current pregnancy, 40 (29.4 %) were not willing to use any method. This is a known precursor of another pregnancy.
Seventy-five women (55.1 %) reported that their partner would support their decision concerning family planning while 51 (37.5 %) felt he would not give support. This is a very important factor as a previous study had shown that strong husband wish is a determinant factor in acceptance and consistent use of contraception .
The use of hospital clients as study participants may limit the generalizability of the study. However, it is more likely that those who do not utilize hospital services are more likely to have an unfavourable attitude towards contraception. However, in the Gambian context, more than 90 % of all pregnant women have antenatal care . Therefore, a community-based study may not differ much.
In conclusion, grand multiparity is still quite common in The Gambia in spite of the availability of modern contraceptive methods. The most common reason given for the current pregnancy among the grand multiparous was a desire for more children. This is closely followed by those who got pregnant by “mistake”. Women need to be informed of the dangers of grand multiparity and advised to practice effective family planning methods to prevent further pregnancy. However, it is imperative to reiterate the importance of quality antenatal care that effectively incorporates the concept of birth preparedness and complication readiness as the effects of these complications can be minimized by good antenatal care. There is however a need to develop family planning messages that specifically target men and religious leaders as they are key opinion leaders and decision makers. Disseminating accurate information on contraceptives to address popular myths on contraception will also be key.. Postpartum contraceptive methods like tubal ligation and the intrauterine contraceptive device should be made readily available and the Gambian reproductive health policy should focus on these methods of contraception in addition to other commonly available contraceptive methods. In the long term, improving access to education for girls will likely reduce the prevalence of grand multiparity.
RVTH, Royal Victoria Teaching Hospital
The authors acknowledge the role of Dr Oley Jallow and Ms Assiatou Jallow in translating the questionnaire to the local languages and for help in coordinating the data collection. The authors are grateful to Dr Olubukola T Idoko for reading the manuscripts and offering useful criticisms.
The authors did not receive any funding to conduct this study.
Availability of data and material
The datasets generated and/or analyzed during this study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
PI conceived the study and contributed to study design, training of interviewers, data analysis and writing up of the manuscript. GN contributed to the study design, data collection, data entry and writing up of the manuscript. MA contributed to the study design, statistical analysis, and the writing up of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
PI is an obstetrician/gynaecologist with interest in reproductive health and reducing maternal mortality and morbidity in Africa. GN is a medical doctor who is currently pursuing her interest in public health. MA is an obstetrician/ gynaecologist and a lecturer.
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Consent for publication
Ethics approval and consent to participate
The ethical committee of the Royal Victoria teaching hospital (now Edward Francis Small teaching Hospital) approved the study. Participants were required to sign an informed consent form before participation in the study. Illiterate participants were required to thumbprint the consent forms but needed to have a literate person as witness.
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
- Bugg GJ, Atwal GS, Maresh M. Grandmultiparae in a modern setting. BJOG. 2002;109:249–53.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Eze JN, Okaro JM, Okafor MH. Outcome of pregnancy in the Grandmultipara in Enugu, Nigeria. Trop J Obstet Gynaecol. 2006;23(1):8–11.Google Scholar
- Omole-Ohonsi A, Ashimi AO. Grand multiparity: obstetric performance in Aminu Kano Teaching Hospital, Kano, Nigeria. Niger J Clin Pract. 2011;14(1):6–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mutihir JT. Obstetric outcome of the Grandmultipara in Jos, Nigeria. J Med Tropics. 2005;7(1):14–20.Google Scholar
- Ali FA, et al. Caesarean section in Grandmultipara. Mtaer Med Pol. 1996;28(93):87–91.Google Scholar
- Solomons B. The dangerous multipara. Lancet. 1934;2:8–11.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Rayamajhi R, Thapa M, Pande S. The challenge of Grandmultiparity in obstetric practice. Kathmandu Univ Med J. 2006;4(1):70–4.Google Scholar
- Mgaya AH, Massawe SN, Kidanto HL, Mgaya HN. Grand multiparity: is it still a risk in pregnancy? BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2013;13:241.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Abasiattai AM, Utuk NM, Udoma EJ, Umoh AV. Grandmultiparity: Outcome of delivery in a tertiary hospital in Southern Nigeria. Niger J Med. 2011;20(3):345–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gharoro EP, Igbafe AA. Grandmultiparity: emerging trend in a tropical community. Trop J Obstet Gynaecol. 2001;18(1):27–30.Google Scholar
- Yasir R, Perveen FZ, Ali L, Perveen S, Tayyab S. Grand-multiparity still an obstetric risk for developing countries. Med Channel. 2010;16:264–8.Google Scholar
- Hoque M, Hoque E, Kader SB. Pregnancy complications of Grandmultiparity at a rural setting of South Africa. Iran J Reprod Med. 2008;6(1):25–31.Google Scholar
- Demographic and Health Survey The Gambia 2013. http://www.gbos.gov.gm/uploads/survey/The%20Gambia%20Demographic%20and%20Health%20Survey%202013%20Preliminary%20Report.pdf Accessed 25th May 2015
- World Health Organization. Gambia Health Profile. www.who.int/gho/countries/gmb.pdf Accessed 27th Jan 2015
- Hoestermann C, Ogbaselassie G, Wacker J, Bastert G. Maternal mortality in the main referral hospital in The Gambia, West Africa. Trop Med Int Health. 1996;1(5):710–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Anya SE. Seasonal variation in the risk and causes of maternal death in the Gambia: malaria appears to be an important factor. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2004;70(5):510–3.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kuti O, Dare FO, Ogunniyi SO. Grand multiparity: Mothers’ own reasons for the index pregnancy. Trop J Obstet Gynaecol. 2001;18(1):34–7.Google Scholar
- Obiechina NJA, Ugboaja JO, Ezeama CO. Grand multiparity: reasons for the index pregnancy. Trop J Med Res. 2008;12(2):65–70.Google Scholar
- Shechter Y, Levy A, Wiznitzer A, Zlotnik A, Sheiner E. Obstetric complications in grand and great grand multiparous women. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2010;23(10):1211–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Geidam AD, Audu BM, Oummate Z. Pregnancy outcome among grand multiparous women at the University of Maiduguri Teaching Hospital: a case control study. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2011;31(5):404–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Al JF. Grandmultiparity: a potential risk factor for adverse pregnancy outcomes. J Reprod Med. 2012;57(1-2):53–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Maymon E, Ghezzi F, Shoham-Vardi I, Hershkowitz R, Franchi M, Katz M, Mazor M. Peripartum complications in grand multiparous women: para 6-9 versus para > or =10. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1998;81(1):21–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nasir SG, Aliyu G, Ya’u I, Gadanya M, Mohammed M, Zubair M, et al. From intense rejection to advocacy: How muslim clerics were engaged in a polio eradication initiative in Northern Nigeria. PLoS Med. 2014;11(8):e1001687.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Kennedy KI. Post-partum contraception. Baillieres Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 1996;10(1):25–41.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Adanu R, Seffah J, Hill A, Darko R, Anarfi J. Contraceptive use by women in Accra Ghana from the 2003 Accra Women’s Health survey. Afr J Reprod Health. 2009;13(1):123–33.PubMedGoogle Scholar