You are viewing the site in preview mode

Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Misoprostol vaginal insert versus misoprostol vaginal tablets for the induction of labour: a cohort study

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
22 Aug 2017 Submitted Original manuscript
19 Nov 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Osman Asicioglu
3 Dec 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Schadrac Agbla
25 Jan 2018 Author responded Author comments - Daniele Bolla
Resubmission - Version 2
25 Jan 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 2
2 Mar 2018 Author responded Author comments - Daniele Bolla
Resubmission - Version 3
2 Mar 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 3
18 Mar 2018 Author responded Author comments - Daniele Bolla
Resubmission - Version 4
18 Mar 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 4
29 Mar 2018 Author responded Author comments - Daniele Bolla
Resubmission - Version 5
29 Mar 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
26 Apr 2018 Editorially accepted
10 May 2018 Article published 10.1186/s12884-018-1788-z

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement