You are viewing the site in preview mode

Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Effect of extra-amniotic Foley’s catheter and vaginal misoprostol versus vaginal misoprostol alone on cervical ripening and induction of labor in Kenya, a randomized controlled trial

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
19 Dec 2017 Submitted Original manuscript
23 Dec 2017 Author responded Author comments - Alfred Osoti
Resubmission - Version 2
23 Dec 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
10 Feb 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Kaori Baba
16 Feb 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Yuko Masuzawa
3 Mar 2018 Author responded Author comments - Alfred Osoti
Resubmission - Version 3
3 Mar 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 3
6 Mar 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Yuko Masuzawa
13 Mar 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Kaori Baba
23 Mar 2018 Author responded Author comments - Alfred Osoti
Resubmission - Version 4
23 Mar 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 4
26 Mar 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Yuko Masuzawa
9 Apr 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Kaori Baba
24 Apr 2018 Author responded Author comments - Alfred Osoti
Resubmission - Version 5
24 Apr 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 5
26 Apr 2018 Author responded Author comments - Alfred Osoti
Resubmission - Version 6
26 Apr 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 6
Publishing
30 Apr 2018 Editorially accepted
12 Jul 2018 Article published 10.1186/s12884-018-1793-2

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement