You are viewing the site in preview mode

Skip to main content

Advertisement

Table 2 Women’s (n = 1153) and FCHVs’ (n = 159) assessments of MA success using the checklist are compared to CAC providers’ (n = 47) determinations based on standard of care

From: Determination of medical abortion success by women and community health volunteers in Nepal using a symptom checklist

  Provider assessment MA successful Provider assessment additional care needed Total PPV NPV Sn Sp
  n %a n %a n %a % (95%, CI) % (95% CI) % (95% CI) % (95% CI)
Women’s Assessment 90 (88, 92) 49 (41, 57) 92 (90, 93) 44 (36, 51)
 MA successful 894 78 99 9 993 86     
 Additional care needed 81 7 77 7 158 14     
 Total 975 85 176 15 1151b 100     
FCHVs’ Assessment 90 (88, 92) 41 (34, 49) 89 (87, 91) 44 (36, 51)
 MA successful 868 75 99 9 967 84     
 Additional care neded 109 9 77 7 186 16     
 Total 977 85 176 15 1153 100     
  1. PPV positive predictive value, NPV negative predictive value, Sn sensitivity, Sp specificity
  2. aNumbers may not add up to 100% due to rounding
  3. b2 women missing self-assessment of success