You are viewing the site in preview mode

Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Delivery of the second twin: influence of presentation on neonatal outcome, a case controlled study

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
6 Oct 2016 Submitted Original manuscript
22 Feb 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Amanda Henry
13 Apr 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jon Barrett
10 May 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Mike Stitely
15 Jul 2017 Author responded Author comments - Gerhard Bogner
Resubmission - Version 2
15 Jul 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
22 Sep 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Mike Stitely
8 Jan 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Amanda Henry
3 Feb 2018 Author responded Author comments - Gerhard Bogner
Resubmission - Version 3
3 Feb 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 3
22 Apr 2018 Author responded Author comments - Gerhard Bogner
Resubmission - Version 4
22 Apr 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 4
29 Apr 2018 Author responded Author comments - Gerhard Bogner
Resubmission - Version 5
29 Apr 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
1 May 2018 Editorially accepted
18 May 2018 Article published 10.1186/s12884-018-1815-0

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement