You are viewing the site in preview mode

Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: A randomized trial comparing the pharmacology of magnesium sulfate when used to treat severe preeclampsia with serial intravenous boluses versus a continuous intravenous infusion

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
2 Jun 2017 Submitted Original manuscript
5 Apr 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Diane Sawchuck
23 Apr 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jos Van Roosmalen
4 Jun 2018 Author responded Author comments - Thomas Easterling
Resubmission - Version 2
4 Jun 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 2
5 Jun 2018 Author responded Author comments - Thomas Easterling
Resubmission - Version 3
5 Jun 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 3
22 Jun 2018 Author responded Author comments - Thomas Easterling
Resubmission - Version 4
22 Jun 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
26 Jun 2018 Editorially accepted
6 Jul 2018 Article published 10.1186/s12884-018-1919-6

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement