You are viewing the site in preview mode

Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Comparison of logistic regression with machine learning methods for the prediction of fetal growth abnormalities: a retrospective cohort study

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
26 Feb 2018 Submitted Original manuscript
24 Apr 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Sandra Dimitri
3 May 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Miranda Davies-Tuck
8 Jun 2018 Author responded Author comments - Stefan Kuhle
Resubmission - Version 2
8 Jun 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 2
2 Jul 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ntasumbumuyange Diomede
8 Jul 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Erica Corbett
18 Jul 2018 Author responded Author comments - Stefan Kuhle
Resubmission - Version 3
18 Jul 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 3
1 Aug 2018 Author responded Author comments - Stefan Kuhle
Resubmission - Version 4
1 Aug 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
7 Aug 2018 Editorially accepted
15 Aug 2018 Article published 10.1186/s12884-018-1971-2

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement